Kruncher Logo
Secondaries

We don’t price the fund. We make it priceable.

Kruncher turns a fund data room into a reviewed, source-linked workbook in your template, with every holding analyzed and current to the day you bid. Your team stays; your reviewers check only what is flagged.

One fund data room
capital accounts · reports · schedules · notices
Fund documents
Fund family · terms (LPA when shared)
Capital account
Seller position
Quarterly report
Schedule of investments
Notices
After the reference date
Structure resolved
8 vehicles · 18 companies
The seller’s stake in each
The market
What the GP did not report
hiringroundsnewscomps
Since the reference date
Events the documents miss
Calls, distributions, exits
Your position
A reviewed register
Workbook · Structure · Checks · NAV view
Under 45 minutes per fund
<45 min
per fund, data room to reviewed workbook
Hundreds
of funds in parallel; time does not grow with the project
20 of 20
holdings analyzed, not just the top five
95%+
accuracy once aligned on your definitions
ISO 27001 · SOC 2 Type II · GDPRsee the Trust Center
The ideal

From data room to price, with everything known today

The best bid draws on three sources at once, and is ready before the deadline.

  • The data room.

    Capital accounts, quarterly reports, schedules of investments, side letters and the LPA when it is shared.

  • What your firm already knows.

    Past deals with the same GP, notes and models in eFront, DealCloud and SharePoint. It stays yours, segregated, never shared or used for training.

  • What the world knows today.

    Hiring, leadership, news and comparables for every company, since the last mark.

Your cash flow model
  1. Day 0Data room opens
  2. Day 1Model ready
  3. Day 5Bid due

Up to 50 million data points and signals a quarter for a large secondaries buyer*

*Top of range: 100 projects × 5 to 10 funds × 10 to 30 companies × 1,000+ data points and 600+ signals, plus ~3,000 fund-level data points per fund.

Today’s options

Every option today gives up speed, accuracy or cost

And all of them stop at the data room: about 80% of the companies in a fund are not analyzed in depth.

  • Manual or outsourced
    Analysts, Excel or an offshore team
    Speed
    Weak: 3 to 5 days per fund
    Accuracy
    Strong: High
    Coverage
    Weak: Top 3 to 5 holdings, about 20%
    Capabilities
    Mixed: What the analyst remembers
    Cost to run
    Weak: Analyst or vendor days on every fund
  • Existing products
    Document AI vendors
    Speed
    Strong: Hours
    Accuracy
    Weak: Not accurate enough on fund data
    Coverage
    Mixed: The documents, not the companies
    Capabilities
    Weak: Limited: fixed schema, no fund structure
    Cost to run
    Mixed: License, plus the rework
  • In-house AI build
    Your own team and stack
    Speed
    Mixed: Fast, after months of building
    Accuracy
    Mixed: Only as good as the team behind it
    Coverage
    Mixed: Whatever the team has time to build
    Capabilities
    Mixed: Grows only with headcount
    Cost to run
    Weak: A full team, infrastructure to scale, ongoing maintenance
“We tried AI, but every figure needs a second look because nobody knows which ones are wrong. The correction eats the benefit.”
Secondaries teams told us.
Why generic AI fails

Fund data is a structure problem, not a text problem

Generic AI reads one page at a time. Fund data breaks across documents, vehicles and quarters.

The same fair value, counted twice.

Funds, feeders, parallel funds and AIVs report at different levels. Sum a combined statement on top of the vehicle schedules and the same asset is counted twice.

Kruncher resolves the fund structure first.

Name changes across quarters.

GPs rename assets, restructure vehicles and switch reporting currency. Read naively, a rename is a write-off plus a new deal, and cost basis and holding period vanish.

Kruncher reconciles every rename, decided once.

The NAV you are shown may not be the NAV you buy.

Many managers present the capital account gross of accrued carry. It is GAAP compliant, and it makes the position look bigger than what is actually being bought.

Kruncher extracts the basis and carries accrued carry as its own position.

The reference date gap.

Nothing in the data room says what happened to the companies after the reference date. That is exactly the window in which the price moves.

Kruncher tracks every company since the mark.

How it works

From a data room to a mark you can challenge

01 · Fund Structure

The fund family, resolved before a single figure is extracted

Master, feeders, parallel funds, AIVs and the seller’s position inside them are resolved from the fund documents first (the LPA when it is in the data room) and land in the same knowledge graph Kruncher draws for every entity. Sleeve values are scaled by derived ownership and never summed twice.

Fund structureSynthetic fund · illustrative
Seller’s LP interest
The position being bought
2.1% of the feeder
ACME Partners VIII Feeder
Cayman feeder
34.0% of the master
VIII-B
Parallel fund
ACME Partners VIII
Master fund
AIV I
Alternative vehicle
18 portfolio companiesheld across the family

Look-through stake: 2.1% × 34.0% = 0.71% of the master, applied once to each holding. Never summed again at the parallel or the AIV.

02 · Data Room Ingestion

Every figure traceable to its page

Each value carries its source file, page and coordinates, with competing candidates and the reason one was preferred. Behind every value sit hundreds of configurable definitions and validations, with a NAV check built in: the fund rebuilt from the top down and from the bottom up. Deterministic checks run on every cell: PASS is silent, WARN and FAIL surface with the numbers behind them.

Data room ingestionSynthetic fund · illustrative
Capital account statement.pdf · p.2
Beginning balance
1,318,402
Contributions
412,000
Distributions
(598,113)
Ending capital balance
1,246,629
NAV · cell C7
1,246,629
Extracted · p.2, line 4 · preferred over the quarterly report
1,322 values in the workbookYour reviewer checks 28
  • 1,281 sourced to a page
  • 13 missing, left blank
  • 28 flagged for review
04 · Scale

Hundreds of funds in parallel, straight into your systems

Under 45 minutes per fund, data room to workbook, whether you run one fund or hundreds in parallel; the look-through on every holding adds time. Delivered in your Excel template, by API and webhook, into Snowflake, or through MCP in Claude or ChatGPT.

Scale and deliverySynthetic fund · illustrative
  • Fund 01<45 min
  • Fund 02<45 min
  • Fund 03<45 min
  • Fund 04<45 min
  • …same

One fund or hundreds: the time per fund does not change.

  • Excel
    In your template
  • API and webhook
    On completion
  • Snowflake
    Into your account
  • MCP
    Claude or ChatGPT
Information advantage

See every company, not just the top five

Other bidders price the holdings they had time to read. You price the whole fund, current to the day you bid.

Typical bidder.

5 of 20holdings reviewed, priced off a GP mark up to two quarters old.

With Kruncher.

20 of 20holdings reviewed, current to the bid date.

Stale GP marks flagged

1,000+ data points and 600+ signals on every company in the fund, every quarter.

The result: a better-informed price. You know which marks are stale before you set the discount, on the companies other bidders never read.

Your data layer

Every fund you see becomes your own data

From scattered documents and spreadsheets to one standardized data model that compounds with every deal.

  • Capital account
  • LPA
  • Q2 report
  • fund_model.xlsx
  • Side letter
  • eFront export
  • Email thread
  • notes_v3.xlsx
  • SOI.pdf
ProjectsFundsCompaniesProject AProject BFundFundFundFundFund
Standardized.

One data model for every project, fund, vehicle and company, in your definitions.

Compounding.

Every fund you have seen or invested in, bid or not, adds to the same record.

Your benchmarks.

Compare a new fund with everything you have seen: marks, terms, managers, companies.

Yours: in your Kruncher workspace or inside your own cloud, never shared with another client, never used for training.

See how the data layer is built
See it working

Kruncher for Secondaries, in four minutes

Four minutes on why it matters, then the product itself: a live walkthrough and a completed fund workspace to explore.

01The overview · 4:00
The problem, today’s options and where Kruncher sits, on a synthetic sample fund.Watch on YouTube
02How it works: live product demo · 5:45
One fund, live in the product: structure, workbook, look-through and the data model.Watch on YouTube
03The live sample

A completed fund workspace on a synthetic fund: the overview, the workbook, the structure, the portfolio analysis, the checks and the delivery.

Built to be trusted

Uncertainty is shown, never hidden

Traceable and reviewed
  • Every figure is extracted, derived, missing or flagged, never filled by assumption
  • PASS is silent; WARN and FAIL surface with the numbers behind them
  • Corrections stay in your workspace and improve the next fund from the same manager
  • 85 to 90% accuracy on the first run against your template; 95%+ after two or three workshops on your definitions
Yours to run
  • Your team stays: Kruncher is the maker, your reviewer is the checker
  • Excel in your template, JSON, the API with webhooks, or MCP
  • SaaS, or deployed in your own AWS, Azure or GCP with your approved models
  • Your cash flow model and underwriting stay yours: build your edge in the projection, not in the ingestion
Secure by default
  • ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II and GDPR
  • Isolated tenant; your data never trains shared models
  • Full export, whenever you want it
  1. 01Classify
  2. 02Resolve structure
  3. 03Extract
  4. 04Derive
  5. 05Validate
  6. 06Review
The team behind it

Built by data scientists and secondaries practitioners

Already working for 40+ investment funds on three continents.

01

Data science and NLP

  • Document ingestion for banks and investors since 2016.
  • Knowledge graphs that resolve funds, vehicles and companies.
  • Validation that shows your reviewer where to look.
02

Finance and secondaries

  • Financial analysts review the output every day.
  • Senior secondaries practitioners define the checks: structure, carry, timing, marks.
  • Your taxonomy and definitions, set in three iterations.
03

The best model for every task

  • Frontier models from our technology partners, each used where it measurably does better.
  • Our own open-weight models for document extraction.
  • Every task benchmarked and re-tested as models evolve, balancing cost and performance.
Technology partners
  • AnthropicPartner
  • Microsoft Partner
  • NVIDIAPartner
  • Google for Startupsfor Startups · Member
Featured in
  • SuperReturn 2026
  • Data-Driven VC Report 2026

Take the teaser to your investment committee.

The download starts when you send the form.

Kruncher for Secondaries cover
Kruncher for Secondaries

The problem, where Kruncher sits, accuracy, the information advantage, your data layer and the team.

Next: book a call with the team. We use these details to follow up. No spam.

Benchmark us on a fund you have already priced.

Send us one fund you have already priced. Within a day you receive the workbook, the JSON and the validation report, to mark against your own analysts’ work.